Comparative characteristics of monocytes isolation conditions by adhesion method for in vitro experiments
https://doi.org/10.36604/1998-5029-2020-78-128-134
Abstract
Aim. To perform a comparative analysis of the influence of various conditions on monocytes adhesion efficiency to determine the most optimal combinations of factors providing the highest yield and purity of the obtained cells.
Materials and methods. Peripheral venous blood samples were obtained from 6 healthy volunteers. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated by standard centrifugation on Ficoll density gradient (1.077 g/ml). After the centrifugation, PBMC were plated in wells of a 24-well plate, coated with collagen or uncoated, and incubated for 2 or 24 hours in RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% fetal calf (FCS) or autologous human serum (AHS). The number of attached monocytes was assessed by epifluorescence microscopy after staining with Hoechst 33342 with automatic counting of nuclei in ten fields of view.
Results. It has been established that incubation of cells for 2 hours in wells without coating in the presence of 10% FCS allows obtaining the largest number of monocytes with median purity of 80.9 (66.5-89.1)%. The number of monocytes obtained by adhesion in collagen-coated wells tended to be lower, regardless of the type of serum used. In our experiment, the adhesion capacity of monocytes was reduced when cells were plated in uncoated wells with 10% AHS. Extended to 24 hours incubation time was accompanied by a significant decrease in the number of attached monocytes in most cases.
Conclusion. Incubation of PBMC for 2 hours on uncoated tissue culture plastic in the presence of 10% FCS provides the highest yield and purity of monocytes in comparison with other tested conditions.
About the Authors
D. A. GassanRussian Federation
Dina A. Gassan, MD, PhD (Med.), Staff Scientist, Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Research
22 Kalinina Str., Blagoveshchensk, 675000
O. O. Kotova
Russian Federation
Olesya O. Kotova, MD, Junior Staff Scientist, Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Research
22 Kalinina Str., Blagoveshchensk, 675000
D. E. Naumov
Russian Federation
Denis E. Naumov, MD, PhD (Med.), Head of Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Research
22 Kalinina Str., Blagoveshchensk, 675000
I. Yu. Sugaylo
Russian Federation
Ivana Yu. Sugaylo, Assistant Researcher, Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Research
22 Kalinina Str., Blagoveshchensk, 675000
Y. G. Gorchakova
Russian Federation
Yana G. Gorchakova, Assistant Researcher, Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Research
22 Kalinina Str., Blagoveshchensk, 675000
A. A. Sinyuk
Russian Federation
Anastasia A. Sinyuk, MD, Junior Staff Scientist, Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Research
22 Kalinina Str., Blagoveshchensk, 675000
References
1. Murray P.J., Wynn T.A. Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011; 11(11):723–737. doi: 10.1038/nri3073
2. Bikash T., Keunwook L. Metabolic influence on macrophage polarization and pathogenesis. BMB Rep. 2019; 52(6):360–372. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2019.52.6.140
3. Tarique A.A., Logan J., Thomas E., Holt P.G., Sly P.D., Fantino E. Phenotypic, functional, and plasticity features of classical and alternatively activated human macrophages. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2015; 53(5):676–88. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2015-0012OC
4. Böyum A. Isolation of mononuclear cells and granulocytes from human blood. Isolation of monuclear cells by one centrifugation, and of granulocytes by combining centrifugation and sedimentation at 1 g. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. Suppl. 1968; 97:77–89.
5. Grievink H.W., Luisman T., Kluft C., Moerland M., Malone K.E. Comparison of Three Isolation Techniques for Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells: Cell Recovery and Viability, Population Composition, and Cell Functionality. Biopreserv. Biobank. 2016; 14(5):410–415. doi: 10.1089/bio.2015.0104
6. Nielsen M.C., Andersen M.N., Møller H.J. Monocyte isolation techniques significantly impact the phenotype of both isolated monocytes and derived macrophages in vitro. Immunology 2020; 159(1):63–74. doi: 10.1111/imm.13125
7. Meital L.T., Coward A.S., Windsor M.T., Bailey T.G., Kuballa A., Russell F.D. A simple and effective method for the isolation and culture of human monocytes from small volumes of peripheral blood. J. Immunol. Methods 2019; 472:75–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2019.04.005
8. Treves A.J., Yagoda D., Haimovitz A., Ramu N., Rachmilewitz D., Fuks Z. The isolation and purification of human peripheral blood monocytes in cell suspension. J. Immunol. Methods 1980; 39(1-2):71–80. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(80)90295-1
9. Saghaeian-Jazi M., Mohammadi S., Sedight S. Culture and Differentiation of Monocyte Derived Macrophages Using Human Serum: An Optimized Method. Zahedan J. Res. Med. Sci. 2016; 18(6):e7362. doi: 10.17795/zjrms-7362
10. Schmidt D., Joyce E.J., Kao W.J. Fetal bovine serum xenoproteins modulate human monocyte adhesion and protein release on biomaterials in vitro. Acta Biomater. 2011; 7(2):515–525. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.08.022
11. Look N. Heat inactivation – are you wasting your time? Art to Science (HyClone Newsletter) 1996; 15:1–5.
12. Koyama Y., Norose-Toyoda K., Hirano S., Kobayashi M., Ebihara T., Someki I., Fujisaki H., Irie S. Type I collagen is a non-adhesive extracellular matrix for macrophages. Arch. Histol. Cytol. 2000; 63(1):71–79. doi: 10.1679/aohc.63.71
13. Garnotel R., Rittié L., Poitevin S., Monboisse J.C., Nguyen P., Potron G., Maquart F.X., Randoux A., Gillery P. Human blood monocytes interact with type I collagen through alpha x beta 2 integrin (CD11c-CD18, gp150-95). J. Immunol. 2000; 164(11):5928–5934. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.11.5928
14. Khalaji S., Zondler L., KleinJan F., Nolte U., Mulaw M.A., Danzer K.M., Weishaupt J.H., Gottschalk K.E. Age Increases Monocyte Adhesion on Collagen. Sci. Rep. 2017; 7:46532. doi: 10.1038/srep46532
Review
For citations:
Gassan D.A., Kotova O.O., Naumov D.E., Sugaylo I.Yu., Gorchakova Y.G., Sinyuk A.A. Comparative characteristics of monocytes isolation conditions by adhesion method for in vitro experiments. Bulletin Physiology and Pathology of Respiration. 2020;(78):128-134. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36604/1998-5029-2020-78-128-134